Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-880 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100F is 3250 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-880.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 16% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-880 - 106 vs 91 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i7-880 - CA$138.88 vs CA$153.98
- Up to 22% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-880 - CA$1.31 vs CA$1.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-880 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
91
85.84905660377359%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.69/FPS
77.51479289940829%
Price, CA$
CA$153.98
90%
Buy for CA$153.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1581 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
106
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.31/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$138.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$138.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1588 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Single-Core
520
37.84570596797671%
Multi-Core
1653
45.05314799672935%
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |