Buy on Amazon
CA$153.98
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms the cheaper Core i7-880 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-880 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 1920 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-880.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - CA$153.98 vs CA$162.98
- Up to 2% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-6700T - CA$1.2 vs CA$1.23 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 4% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-880 - 133 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-880 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-880 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-880
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
128
96.2406015037594%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.2/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$153.98
100%
Value Winner
CPU Processor Intel Core i7-880 i7 880 3.067 GHz Quad-Core Eight-Thread CPU Processor LGA 1156
Buy for CA$153.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1581 minutes ago
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
133
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.23/FPS
97.5609756097561%
Price, CA$
CA$162.98
94%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-6700T 2.8GHz Tray CPU
Buy for CA$162.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1585 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-880
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-880
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Single-Core
520
43.956043956043956%
Multi-Core
1653
46.35445877734156%
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
