Key Differences
In short — Core i7-880 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-880 is 918 days older than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Performs up to 11% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Celeron G1610 - 51 vs 46 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i7-880 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-880 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
51
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.02/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$153.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$153.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3663 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
81.92307692307692%
Multi-Core
739
44.70659407138536%
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Lynnfield | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 55 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |