Buy on Amazon
CA$112
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $353
Availability
MSRP in USD: $353
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-875K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 3623 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - CA$112.0 vs CA$414.92
- Up to 68% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than Core i9-10900 - CA$0.61 vs CA$1.91 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 17% better in Far Cry 5 than Core i7-875K - 217 vs 185 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
185
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core I7-875K I7 875K I7 875 2.933 GHz Used Quad-Core Eight-Thread CPU Processor LGA 1156
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
217
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.91/FPS
31%
Price, CA$
CA$414.92
26%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900 Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for CA$414.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
|---|---|---|
| May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
