Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-875K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 3623 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - CA$112.0 vs CA$394.29
- Up to 67% better value when playing Valorant than Core i9-10900KF - CA$0.16 vs CA$0.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 19% better in Valorant than Core i7-875K - 817 vs 688 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 20 vs 8 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
688
84%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
817
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.48/FPS
33%
Price, CA$
CA$394.29
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$394.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |