Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-875K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 4503 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - CA$112.0 vs CA$389.0
- Up to 49% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-13600K - CA$2.49 vs CA$4.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 76% better in Starfield than Core i7-875K - 79 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
45
56%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.49/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18470 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
79
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.92/FPS
50%
Price, CA$
CA$389
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$389 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18470 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |