Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-875K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 3623 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - CA$112.0 vs CA$349.79
- Up to 65% better value when playing HITMAN 3 than Core i7-10700F - CA$0.6 vs CA$1.71 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 9% better in HITMAN 3 than Core i7-875K - 204 vs 188 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 16 vs 8 threads
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
188
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13321 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
204
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.71/FPS
35%
Price, CA$
CA$349.79
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$349.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13321 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |