Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700K is 765 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 20% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G3900 - 189 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-8700K - CA$66.34 vs CA$314.0
- Up to 75% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i7-8700K - CA$0.42 vs CA$1.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700K - 51 vs 95 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
189
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.66/FPS
25%
Price, CA$
CA$314
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$314 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2394 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
158
83%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$66.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$66.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2393 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700K | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |