Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms Core i7-820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 4486 days newer than Core i7-820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-820QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i7-820QM - 191 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-820QM - 12 vs 8 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-820QM
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Core i5-12400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-820QM | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 13.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
