Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U outperforms Core i7-820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is 3484 days newer than Core i7-820QM.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Performs up to 7% better in Valorant than Core i7-820QM - 727 vs 678 FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i7-820QM - 15 vs 45 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-820QM
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-820QM
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Single-Core
382
40.899357601713064%
Multi-Core
1009
38.0180859080633%
Intel Core i7-820QM | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 13.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
