Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms Core i7-820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 3872 days newer than Core i7-820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-820QM
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 45 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 62% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-820QM - 367 vs 226 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
367
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$142.84
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$142.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-820QM | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |