Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms Core i7-820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 3574 days newer than Core i7-820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-820QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 13% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-820QM - 168 vs 149 FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
168
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.95/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$159.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$159.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-820QM | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |