Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 45 days older than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 9% better in F1 23 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 220 vs 202 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7820X - 32 vs 16 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
202
91.81818181818183%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1393.07
100%
Buy for CA$1,393.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77868 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
82.99078667611623%
Multi-Core
7539
96.05045228691553%
Intel Core i7-7820X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |