Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6800K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2409 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$214.29 vs CA$2360.48
- Up to 89% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-13400F - CA$1.06 vs CA$9.71 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 20% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-6800K - 243 vs 203 FPS
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
203
83%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.06/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$214.29
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$214.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
243
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$9.71/FPS
10%
Price, CA$
CA$2360.48
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$2,360.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |