Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 981 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 6% better in HITMAN 3 than FX-8350 - 199 vs 188 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i7-6700 - CA$182.45 vs CA$228.88
- Up to 16% better value when playing HITMAN 3 than Core i7-6700 - CA$0.97 vs CA$1.15 per FPS
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
199
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.15/FPS
84%
Price, CA$
CA$228.88
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$228.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12252 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
188
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12252 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |