Buy on Amazon
CA$600.75
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $332
Availability
MSRP in USD: $332
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms Core i7-640LM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 2803 days newer than Core i7-640LM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640LM
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 25 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 5% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-640LM - 122 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640LM - 24 vs 4 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i9-7920X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
122
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.92/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$600.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-7920X X-Series Processor 12 Cores up to 4.3 GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 140W (Tray)
Buy for CA$600.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-640LM
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Core i9-7920X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640LM | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
25 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
