Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4790T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4790T is 514 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790T
- Performs up to 21% better in Rust than Celeron G1620 - 184 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 45 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i7-4790T - CA$32.99 vs CA$369.0
- Up to 89% better value when playing Rust than Core i7-4790T - CA$0.22 vs CA$2.01 per FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
184
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.01/FPS
10.945273631840797%
Price, CA$
CA$369
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$369 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52434 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
152
82.6086956521739%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$32.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52433 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
35.56521739130435%
Multi-Core
723
21.384205856255544%
Intel Core i7-4790T | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |