Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4790T outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4790T is 932 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790T
- Performs up to 38% better in F1 23 than FX-8150 - 201 vs 146 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i7-4790T - CA$87.12 vs CA$299.99
- Up to 60% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i7-4790T - CA$0.6 vs CA$1.49 per FPS
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
201
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.49/FPS
40%
Price, CA$
CA$299.99
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$299.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
146
72%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 224 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4790T | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |