Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4785T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1949 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4785T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4785T
- Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$196.3 vs CA$1149.12
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 26% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-4785T - 48 vs 38 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4785T - 24 vs 8 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$196.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66973 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
48
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1149.12
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,149.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66973 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
951
74.64678178963892%
Multi-Core
3076
41.266434129326534%
Intel Core i7-4785T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |