Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4770K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4770K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2844 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770K
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - CA$170.0 vs CA$304.99
- Up to 35% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i5-11600K - CA$0.95 vs CA$1.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 84 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 16% better in World of Warcraft than Core i7-4770K - 208 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4770K - 12 vs 8 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
179
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.95/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$170
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$170 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5437 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
208
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.47/FPS
64%
Price, CA$
CA$304.99
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$304.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5436 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4770K | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |