Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 6% better in Valheim than Core i5-10400 - 214 vs 201 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - CA$174.99 vs CA$304.99
- Up to 39% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-11600K - CA$0.87 vs CA$1.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
214
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.43/FPS
60%
Price, CA$
CA$304.99
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$304.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17937 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
201
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$174.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$174.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17937 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |