Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F and the cheaper Core i5-10400 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - CA$174.99 vs CA$349.79
- Up to 49% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-10700F - CA$1.33 vs CA$2.59 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-10400 - 135 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400 - 16 vs 12 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.33/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$174.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$174.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11976 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
135
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.59/FPS
51%
Price, CA$
CA$349.79
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$349.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11976 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |