Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - CA$174.99 vs CA$304.99
- Up to 38% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-11600K - CA$1.08 vs CA$1.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-10400 - 176 vs 162 FPS
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
162
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.08/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$174.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$174.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11818 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
176
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.73/FPS
62%
Price, CA$
CA$304.99
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$304.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11818 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |