Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K and the cheaper Core i5-11400F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 8% better in FIFA 23 than Core i5-11400F - 220 vs 203 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - CA$196.23 vs CA$304.99
- Up to 30% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i5-11600K - CA$0.97 vs CA$1.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
220
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.39/FPS
69%
Price, CA$
CA$304.99
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$304.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4025 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
203
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$196.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$196.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4026 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |