Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4770K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4770K is 1530 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770K
- Performs up to 2% better in Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 56 vs 55 FPS
- Up to 81% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$163.91 vs CA$885.66
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 84 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4770K - 32 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$163.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
55
98.21428571428571%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$885.66
18%
Buy for CA$885.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
92.56916996047431%
Multi-Core
7539
100%
Intel Core i7-4770K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |