Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i7-4710HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2221 days newer than Core i7-4710HQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4710HQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 47 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 7% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i7-4710HQ - 213 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4710HQ - 20 vs 8 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
213
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.82/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$388
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$388 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4710HQ | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |