Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4500U outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4500U is 183 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4500U
- Performs up to 5% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G1620 - 103 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 15 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
98
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$32.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2013
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4500U | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |