Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3960X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 2096 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3960X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3960X
- Up to 44% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$500.0 vs CA$885.66
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i7-3960X - 232 vs 226 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3960X - 32 vs 12 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$500 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
232
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$885.66
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$885.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Single-Core
690
58.923996584116146%
Multi-Core
3358
44.54171640801167%
Intel Core i7-3960X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |