Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 1220 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - CA$214.0 vs CA$239.49
- Up to 8% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-6700T - CA$1.66 vs CA$1.8 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 3% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-3770K - 133 vs 129 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 35 vs 77 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
129
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.66/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$214
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$214 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
133
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.8/FPS
92%
Price, CA$
CA$239.49
89%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$239.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |