Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - CA$211.77 vs CA$327.03
- Up to 18% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-11600 - CA$3.85 vs CA$4.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 27% better in Starfield than Core i7-6700T - 70 vs 55 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 12 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
55
78%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.85/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$211.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$211.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
70
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.67/FPS
82%
Price, CA$
CA$327.03
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$327.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700T | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |