Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770K is 651 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-760 - 129 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - CA$41.21 vs CA$214.0
- Up to 81% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-3770K - CA$0.32 vs CA$1.66 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
129
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.66/FPS
19%
Price, CA$
CA$214
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$214 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
127
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |