Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 581 days older than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 2% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G1820 - 325 vs 319 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 53 vs 77 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for CA$153.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76387 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
73.17436661698957%
Multi-Core
825
35.88516746411483%
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
77 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |