Key Differences
In short — Core i7-875K outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-875K is 1281 days older than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Performs up to 0% better in World of Tanks than Celeron G1820 - 506 vs 505 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
96.46365422396856%
Multi-Core
825
46.84838160136286%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |