Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 3026 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - CA$350.0 vs CA$497.02
- Up to 9% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than Core i7-9700F - CA$3.57 vs CA$3.94 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 29% better in Far Cry 6 than Core i7-2600K - 126 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
98
77%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.57/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$350
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$350 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11246 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
126
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.94/FPS
90%
Price, CA$
CA$497.02
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$497.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11253 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2600K | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |