Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-9700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 75 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Up to 8% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600X - CA$348.88 vs CA$380.0
- Up to 7% better value when playing Death Stranding than Ryzen 5 3600X - CA$1.54 vs CA$1.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 1% better in Death Stranding than Core i7-9700F - 229 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 12 vs 8 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
227
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.54/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$348.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$348.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14362 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
229
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.66/FPS
92%
Price, CA$
CA$380
91%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$380 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14362 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |