Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 1057 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-6900K - 177 vs 176 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - CA$248.62 vs CA$448.62
- Up to 44% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-9700F - CA$1.41 vs CA$2.53 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 16 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
177
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.53/FPS
55%
Price, CA$
CA$448.62
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$448.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
176
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.41/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$248.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$248.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |