Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 1973 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 16% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 399 vs 344 FPS
- Up to 58% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$587.59 vs CA$1393.07
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-13700F - 32 vs 24 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for CA$587.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74938 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
344
86.21553884711778%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1393.07
42%
Buy for CA$1,393.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74939 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
44.00601277715145%
Multi-Core
7539
48.717285945072696%
Intel Core i7-13700F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |