Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700KF is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700KF
- Performs up to 11% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G3900 - 186 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i7-11700KF - CA$42.99 vs CA$344.73
- Up to 86% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-11700KF - CA$0.26 vs CA$1.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
186
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.85/FPS
14%
Price, CA$
CA$344.73
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$344.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
167
89%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$42.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$42.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700KF | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |