Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 21% better in Battlefield IV than FX-6300 - 448 vs 371 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - CA$59.57 vs CA$386.61
- Up to 81% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i7-11700F - CA$0.16 vs CA$0.86 per FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
448
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.86/FPS
18%
Price, CA$
CA$386.61
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$386.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
371
82%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$59.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700F | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |