Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 3210 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 3% better in Control than Core i5-3470 - 205 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3470 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - CA$53.99 vs CA$387.75
- Up to 86% better value when playing Control than Core i7-11700F - CA$0.27 vs CA$1.89 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
205
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.89/FPS
14%
Price, CA$
CA$387.75
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$387.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2326 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
199
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$53.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$53.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2326 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700F | vs | Intel Core i5-3470 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |