Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 2700 - 193 vs 181 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - CA$280.0 vs CA$322.97
- Up to 7% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700KF - CA$1.55 vs CA$1.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.67/FPS
92%
Price, CA$
CA$322.97
86%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$322.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16019 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
181
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.55/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$280
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$280 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16019 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |