Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 3574 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 16% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-760 - 135 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - CA$41.21 vs CA$350.71
- Up to 86% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-10700F - CA$0.36 vs CA$2.6 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
135
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.6/FPS
13%
Price, CA$
CA$350.71
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$350.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
116
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 163 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |