Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 575 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 1% better in The Outer Worlds than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 206 vs 203 FPS
- Up to 67% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$375.13 vs CA$1149.12
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 24 vs 16 threads
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$375.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75232 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
203
98.54368932038835%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1149.12
32%
Buy for CA$1,149.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75232 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |