Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-10700F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-10700F is 575 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 17% better in League of Legends than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 195 vs 166 FPS
- Up to 63% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$373.06 vs CA$1005.68
- Up to 68% better value when playing League of Legends than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$1.91 vs CA$6.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 24 vs 16 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
195
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.91/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$373.06
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$373.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
166
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.06/FPS
31%
Price, CA$
CA$1005.68
37%
Buy for CA$1,005.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |