Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600KF is 2268 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Performs up to 9% better in God of War than FX-8350 - 177 vs 163 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i5-9600KF - CA$182.45 vs CA$279.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing God of War than Core i5-9600KF - CA$1.12 vs CA$1.58 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 8 vs 6 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
177
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.58/FPS
70%
Price, CA$
CA$279
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13000 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
163
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.12/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13000 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600KF | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |