Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9600K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9600K is 183 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 7 2700 - 178 vs 174 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - CA$225.0 vs CA$280.0
- Up to 22% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 7 2700 - CA$1.26 vs CA$1.61 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 16 vs 6 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
178
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17416 minutes ago
Buy for CA$280 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17416 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600K | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |