Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 261 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 10% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 3 3200G - 137 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i5-9600K - CA$133.74 vs CA$225.0
- Up to 35% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-9600K - CA$1.07 vs CA$1.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
137
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.64/FPS
65%
Price, CA$
CA$225
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
125
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.07/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$133.74
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$133.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600K | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |