Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-14100F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-9600K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-14100F is 1907 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-9600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 7% better in Deathloop than Core i5-9600K - 194 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i5-9600K - CA$159.0 vs CA$213.75
- Up to 30% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i5-9600K - CA$0.82 vs CA$1.17 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 8 vs 6 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$213.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
194
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.82/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$159
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$159 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600K | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |