Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2445 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield IV than Core i7-3770 - 413 vs 380 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 65 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - CA$158.0 vs CA$174.28
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
413
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$174.28
90%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$174.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38310 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
380
92.00968523002422%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$158
100%
Buy for CA$158 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38305 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
671
48.69375907111756%
Multi-Core
2299
47.55895738518825%
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |