Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2921 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i7-2600K - 207 vs 193 FPS
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i7-2600K - CA$148.54 vs CA$210.49
- Up to 34% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i7-2600K - CA$0.72 vs CA$1.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
207
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$148.54
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$148.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
Buy for CA$210.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |