Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2921 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Rocket League than Core i7-2600K - 715 vs 682 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - CA$154.2 vs CA$173.85
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
715
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$173.85
88%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$173.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
682
95.38461538461539%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$154.2
100%
Buy for CA$154.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
668
48.47605224963715%
Multi-Core
2320
47.99338022341746%
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |