Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 516 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 3% better in Ready or Not than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 266 vs 259 FPS
- Up to 80% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$179.13 vs CA$885.66
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 32 vs 6 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for CA$179.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 289 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
259
97.36842105263158%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$885.66
20%
Buy for CA$885.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 289 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
84.97822931785196%
Multi-Core
7539
100%
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |